Estate Planning Tips

 

February 11, 2014 – When I speak with people about estate planning they are almost always focused on the Will/Trust aspect of their plan.  While these are important components, the other documents typically making up the plan are just as important.  A healthcare directive, power of attorney, and health care power of attorney, are crucial to any plan.  Those documents allow us to pick who we want to assist us with finances, healthcare decisions, or other needs, if circumstances require.  Without these, the next best option likely requires a guardianship process in court with a judge determining who should make those decisions.  While a guardianship is a good backup when someone hasn’t completed their planning, the time and expense can exceed the cost of even very complicated estate plans.  These documents save time and expense, avoid uncertainty, and let us stay in control.  Estate planning isn’t all about death- it’s about living too!

301074_4667032961794_2129610629_n

Estate Planning Attorney Patrick Hanis
phanis@hiplawfirm.com
253.520.5000

Jorge Ramos to volunteer at St. Vincent de Paul’s Centro Rendu

 

February 7, 2014 – HIP’s Family Law attorney Jorge Ramos will be volunteering on the first Wednesday of every month at the local St. Vincent de Paul’s Centro Rendu. Jorge welcomes the privilege to provide free legal consultations for individuals who face financial or language barriers. Jorge joins HIP’s immigration department as volunteers at the Centro Rendu.

Jorge Ramos
photo of Jorge Ramos
253.520.5000
jramos@hiplawfirm.com

Federal judge rules drivers allowed to flash headlights to warn of speed traps

 

February 05, 2014 – A federal judge in Missouri ruled this week held that drivers have a First Amendment right to flash their headlights to warn other motorists of nearby police and speed traps. 

The order by U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey in St. Louis on Monday stems from a lawsuit filed by Ellisville resident Michael Elli. In 2012, Elli flashed his headlights to warn oncoming vehicles of a radar set up by police in the town of Ellisville.

A flash of headlights is a common way motorists communicate to oncoming drivers of either a dangerous situation or the presence of police — in essence, a warning to slow down. 

An officer saw the flash and pulled over Elli, who could have faced a fine of up to $1,000 if convicted. Elli, was accused of “[f]lashing lights on certain vehicles . . . warning of RADAR ahead,” according to court papers obtained by The Wall Street Journal.

He faced a fine up to $1,000 in addition to points on his license, according to the report.

The city later dropped the charge, but the American Civil Liberties Union sued on Elli’s behalf anyway, claiming the arrest violated his First Amendment right to free speech. 

Ellisville City Attorney George Restovich said the city changed the policy after the case went to court and no longer pulls over people for flashing headlights.

“The reality is that the injunction doesn’t change the way the city has been operating for the past 12 months,” Restovich said. 

At a hearing on the lawsuit last year, Ellisville officials made the case that flashing headlights could interfere with a police investigation. But Autrey said in his ruling that the flashing of headlights “sends a message to bring one’s driving in conformity with the law — whether it be by slowing down, turning on one’s own headlamps at dusk or in the rain, or proceeding with caution.” 

“The chilling effect of Ellisville’s policy and custom of having its police officers pull over, detain, and cite individuals who are perceived as having communicated to oncoming traffic by flashing their headlamps and then prosecuting and imposing fines upon those individuals remains, regardless” of the city’s decision to change its policy, the judge wrote, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

Tony Rothert, legal director of the ACLU’s Missouri chapter told the Journal’s Law Blog that the judge’s ruling is a civil rights victory for motorists.

“When someone is communicating in a public street, [he is] expressing [himself] in a way that’s protected by the First Amendment,” Rothert said. “Unless there is a strong reason why the government should be allowed to censor that speech, the police shouldn’t be stopping or prosecuting people because of the content of their speech.”

 
“Federal judge rules driver allowed to flash headlights to warn of speed traps” February 05, 2014
www.foxnews.com and Associated Press